The proof which is below is correct, but unmotivated. Perhaps we can find an alternate proof which provides more insight
By thm:nonzerolifts, we see that it we can always find nonzero Shimura lifts.
Here we have some displayed and aligned equations.
Here is an unnumbered displayed equation:
![]() |
Here is a numbered displayed equation:
![]() |
(1) |
Here is the same expression, but inline and not displayed. Notice it
is set smaller and the summation indeices are placed differently:
Note I
need to use $ to surround my formula when in an inline mode.
For an aligned display we have
![]() |
||
![]() |
A numbered version is given by
![]() |
(2) | |
![]() |
(3) |
A version with only one number associated to the group of equations is given by
![]() |
(4) |
Something with cases
![]() |
This should be more than enough displayed equations for the average person. Gosh, I sure hope this paper gets accepted. More remarks of little permanent consequence.
Let's get the other references in now. See [1] and [2].